As green as we think? The case of the College of Charleston green building initiative

Author:

Owens Katharine A.,Halfacre‐Hitchcock Angela

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to disseminate knowledge regarding the experiences of a student team in implementing a campus‐level sustainability initiative, outlining the strategy to measure the potential impact of this initiative.Design/methodology/approachProject design is a case study. Via interviewing and surveys, the study observed student and faculty attitudes, information levels and behaviors regarding sustainability both before and after project implementation. Calculated sustainability scores were calculated for both faculty and students. Data were collected with the intention of understanding first, if any changes occurred in these campus community members, and second, if changes occurred, could the changes be linked to the project.FindingsFaculty experienced a significant increase in sustainability scores over the course of the project. Faculty interviews were used to glean a rich understanding of attitudes, information and behaviors about sustainability. A building waste audit was conducted to substantiate any self‐reported changes in recycling behavior. In contrast, students experienced either a significant decrease in sustainability scores or an insignificant decrease in sustainability scores. Large‐scale, campus‐wide behavioral changes of individuals did not take place. Some community members showcase sustainable behaviors, but for reasons not definitively linked with this project and its outreach.Practical implicationsThis project serves as a stepping stone for other student teams; an opportunity to learn from our successes and mistakes, improving design of similar projects. General information about this type of project was discovered namely faculty and student participants were cooperative and outreach was not as extensive as imagined. The study also suggest future research could benefit from analyzing barriers to sustainable behaviors, addressing these in outreach for a similar project. Evaluating future projects to understand their effectiveness produces increasingly informative research.Originality/valueThis paper looks beyond the initial enthusiasm for conducting campus sustainability projects, shedding light on the ways they may effect the campus community.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference25 articles.

1. Berg, B.L. (2001), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

2. Berke, P.R. and Conroy, M.M. (2000), “Are we planning for sustainable development?”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 21‐37.

3. Bernard, H.R. (1995), Research Methods in Anthropology, Alta Mira Press, London.

4. Boyle, S. and McIntosh, P. (2002), “The action report: new campaign urges campuses to buy ‘Green’”, National Wildlife Magazine, Vol. 40 No. 3.

5. Ebong, R.D. (2002), “Appraisal of knowledge and attitude of Akwa Ibomites toward a sustainable environment in Nigeria”, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 110 No. 3, pp. 211‐2.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3