The case for sustainable laboratories: first steps at Harvard University

Author:

Woolliams Jessica,Lloyd Matthew,Spengler John D.

Abstract

PurposeLaboratories typically consume 4‐5 times more energy than similarly‐sized commercial space. This paper adds to a growing dialogue about how to “green” a laboratory's design and operations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is divided into three sections. The first section reviews the background and theoretical issues. A case is made for sustainable laboratories, introduce the Harvard Green Campus Initiative's (HGCIs) study of potential energy reduction in Harvard's research laboratories and examine other issues including: behavioral change, technical change, and the required codes and suggested standards that influence laboratory design and operations. Next, a survey conducted through a partnership between HGCI, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), and Laboratories for the twenty‐first century (Labs21) to clarify issues surrounding use of codes and standards in high‐performance laboratory design and maintenance is introduced.FindingsSurvey findings highlight the confusion among survey participants surrounding the applications and interpretations of current lab guidelines, codes and standards, particularly addressing sustainable performance. The findings suggest that confusion has financial, environmental, and human health consequences, and that more research is needed to define the operational risks to laboratory workers. Findings indicate that many energy efficient technologies and strategies are not routinely specified in lab design, perhaps in part due to confusion concerning the guidelines, standards and codes.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough the survey sample size is too small to be statistically significant, it does provide valuable insight into the general confusion surrounding the applications and interpretations of current codes and guidelines, especially those addressing sustainable performance.Practical implicationsThe practical implications of this research are many, including that there are many opportunities for technical and behavior improvements within modern university laboratories that yield great energy savings. This is critical as laboratories are one of the most energy‐intense building types on a university campus.Originality/valueThe critical originality of the paper is provided in the analysis of the obstacles to achieving the great potential energy savings that exist within the university laboratory context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference34 articles.

1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (1995), Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice, 22nd ed., ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH.

2. American National Standard for Laboratory Ventilation (2002), ANSI/AIHA Z9.5, Section 3.3.1..

3. ASHRAE (1999), “ASHRAE applications handbook – HVAC applications”, Atlanta, Section 13.8.

4. Bell, G., Sartor, D. and Mills, E. (2003), “The Berkeley hood: development and commercialization of an innovative high‐performance laboratory fume hood”, a Progress and Research Status: 1995 – September 2003, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL‐48983 (rev.), September 2003, available at: http://ateam.lbl.gov/hightech/fumehood/doc/LBNL‐48983_FY03.pdf.

5. Brewer, B., Harris, A. and Thomann, W. (2003), “Evaluation of energy performance changes related to hood sash best management practices”, paper presented at Laboratories for the 21st Century Conference, Colorado, available at: www.epa.gov/labs21century/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3