Author:
Moss Alex,Farrelly Kieran
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the performance implications for UK DC pension fund investors who choose to combine global listed and UK unlisted real estate in a blended allocation relative to a pure unlisted solution.
Design/methodology/approach
– Blended listed and unlisted real estate portfolios are constructed. Investor risk and returns are then studied over the full 15 year sample horizon and distinct cyclical phases over this period using a number of risk-return metrics. Performance is then contrasted with that of a pure unlisted solution, as well as UK equity market and bond total returns over the same period.
Findings
– A UK DC pension fund investor choosing to construct a blended global listed and UK unlisted real estate portfolio would have experienced material return enhancement relative to a pure unlisted solution. The “price” of this enhanced performance and improved liquidity profile is, unsurprisingly, higher portfolio volatility. However, because of the improved returns, the impact upon measured risk adjusted returns is less significant.
Practical implications
– Relatively liquid blended listed and unlisted real estate portfolios create efficient risk and return outcomes for investors.
Originality/value
– This study uses actual fund rather than index data (i.e. measures delivered returns to investors), has chosen a global rather than single country listed real estate allocation and is focused on providing clarity around the real estate exposure for a specific investment requirement, the UK DC pension fund market.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference16 articles.
1. Baum, A.
and
Moss, A.
(2013), “Are listed real estate stocks managed as part of the real estate allocation?”,
EPRA
.
2. Bond, S.
,
Hwang, S.
,
Mitchell, P.
and
Satchell, S.
(2007), “Will private equity and hedge funds replace real estate in mixed-asset portfolios?”,
Journal of Portfolio Management
, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 74-84.
3. Cohen and Steers
(2009
)
,
Listed Real Estate Performance as a Predictor of Direct Real Estate Performance
, Cohen and Steers.
4. Hoesli, H.
,
Lekander, J.
and
Witkiewicz, W.
(2004), “New international evidence on real estate as a portfolio diversifier”,
Journal of Real Estate Research
, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 161-206.
5. Hoesli, M.
and
Oikarinen, E.
(2012), “Are REITs real estate? Evidence from international sector level data”,
Journal of International Money and Finance
, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 1823-1850.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The evolution of Belgium REITs;Journal of Property Investment & Finance;2019-07-01
2. Optimal composition of hybrid/blended real estate portfolios;Journal of Property Investment & Finance;2019-02-04
3. The emergence of Spanish REITs;Journal of Property Investment & Finance;2018-07-06
4. The emergence and performance of German REITs;Journal of Property Investment & Finance;2018-02-05
5. The significance and performance of UK-REITs in a mixed-asset portfolio;Journal of European Real Estate Research;2016-08-01