Abstract
PurposeThis article aims to explain the role of philosophical anchors and research paradigms in business research, and how they can be extrapolated in the transformative era of automation, digitalization, hyperconnectivity, obligations, globalization and sustainability (ADHOGS) in the midst of disruption, volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (DVUCA).Design/methodology/approachThis article entails a general review based on the 3Es of exposure, expertise and experience, delving into the ontological, epistemological, methodological, axiological and rhetorical aspects of the major research paradigms—i.e. positivism, post-positivism, constructivism, interpretivism and pragmatism—and their interplay with the emergent trends shaping business research.FindingsThis article underscores the multifaceted nature of business research in the modern day, with an increasing need for blending, or shifting between, research paradigms to address the complex issues arising from automation, digitalization, hyperconnectivity, obligations, globalization and sustainability (ADHOGS). This article also highlights the nuanced interplay between research paradigms and theoretical perspectives, demonstrating the rich, diverse potential of business research inquiries.Research limitations/implicationsWhile this article provides a broad overview of the interplay between research paradigms and emerging trends, future research could explore each of these interplays in greater detail, conducting empirical studies or utilizing specific case studies.Practical implicationsResearchers and practitioners should be open to adopting, combining or switching between different paradigms according to the demands of their research questions, context and trends shaping the business landscape, thereby underscoring the need for methodological flexibility and reflexivity in business research.Social implicationsThe shift toward embracing digital transformations and integrating sustainability in business research holds significant implications, driving socially responsible and sustainable business practices at the micro-level, and by extension, industrial revolution and sustainable development at the macro-level.Originality/valueThis article offers a holistic and contextualized view of the philosophy of science and research paradigms for business research, bridging the gap between philosophical foundations and contemporary research trends.
Reference38 articles.
1. An A is an A: the new bottom line for valuing academic research;Academy of Management Perspectives,2020
2. Managing the dark side of digitalization in the future of work: a fuzzy TISM approach;Journal of Innovation and Knowledge,2022
3. Corporate social responsibility: insights from COVID‐19 and stakeholder theory;Global Business and Organizational Excellence,2023
4. Digital transformation and business model innovation: advances, challenges and opportunities;International Journal of Quality and Innovation,2022
5. Dawson, M. (2020), “Exploring secure computing for the internet of things, internet of everything, web of things, and hyperconnectivity”, in Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Securing the Internet of Things: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global, pp. 1186-1195, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9866-4.ch053.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献