Methodologies for crawler based Web surveys

Author:

Thelwall Mike

Abstract

There have been many attempts to study the content of the Web, either through human or automatic agents. Describes five different previously used Web survey methodologies, each justifiable in its own right, but presents a simple experiment that demonstrates concrete differences between them. The concept of crawling the Web also bears further inspection, including the scope of the pages to crawl, the method used to access and index each page, and the algorithm for the identification of duplicate pages. The issues involved here will be well‐known to many computer scientists but, with the increasing use of crawlers and search engines in other disciplines, they now require a public discussion in the wider research community. Concludes that any scientific attempt to crawl the Web must make available the parameters under which it is operating so that researchers can, in principle, replicate experiments or be aware of and take into account differences between methodologies. Also introduces a new hybrid random page selection methodology.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Reference62 articles.

1. Albitz, P. and Liu, C. (1992), DNS and BIND, O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA.

2. Ardo, A. and Lundberg, S. (1998), “A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service – the DESIRE way”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Vol. 30 No. 1‐7, pp. 173‐83.

3. Bar‐Yossef, Z., Berg, A., Chien, S., Fakcharoenphol, J. and Weitz, D. (2000), “Approximating aggregate queries about Web pages via random walks”, Proceedings of the 26th VLDB Conference, Cairo, pp. 535‐41.

4. Ben‐Shaul, I., Herscovici, M., Jacovi, M., Maarek, Y.S., Pelleg, D., Shtalhaim, M., Soroka, V. and Ur, S. (1999), “Adding support for dynamic and focused search with Fetuccino”, Computer Networks, Vol. 31, pp. 1653‐65.

5. Berners‐Lee, T. (1993), “WorldWide Web seminar”, available at: www.w3.org/Talks/General/Concepts.html (accessed 22 October 1999).

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Trajectories through temporal networks;Applied Network Science;2021-05-03

2. NoSQL Web Crawler Application;Advances in Computers;2018

3. Managing the quality of e-learning resources in repositories;Computer Applications in Engineering Education;2015-01-12

4. Online Networking in the Tourism Industry;Journal of Travel Research;2014-05-08

5. Search markets and search results: The case of Bing;Library & Information Science Research;2013-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3