Author:
Bothos Efthimios,Apostolou Dimitris,Mentzas Gregoris
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the use of information aggregation markets (IAMs) for community‐based idea management and to present IDeM, a novel Internet‐based software tool that can be used for generating and evaluating new ideas utilizing the concept of IAMs.Design/methodology/approachStarting with a review of existing methods for collective intelligence, IAMs are identified as a prominent method for collective intelligence. Specific requirements for exploring IAMs for idea management are derived. Based on these requirements, a software tool for implementing IAMs in the context of idea management is developed (IDeM). IDeM has been evaluated and evaluation results are used to identify IDeM's benefits and limitations. A review of related work points out the innovative characteristics of IDeM.FindingsEvaluation results indicate that IAMs is an efficient method for idea generation and evaluation. Moreover IDeM is perceived both as easy to use and efficient in supporting idea generation and evaluation.Practical implicationsIDeM can be used by commercial or other organizations for supporting generation and evaluation of new ideas.Originality/valueIDeM's innovative aspects are: in addition to trading, it allows users involvement by means of new idea submission, rating of ideas and commenting on ideas; it confronts the uncertainty of new idea related events by offering an expert based valuation mechanism.; and it extends the typical output of IAM tools – which is price of idea‐stocks – by calculating the volume weighted average price.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference29 articles.
1. Adamides, E.D. and Karacapilidis, N. (2006), “Information technology support for the knowledge and social processes of innovation management”, Technovation, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 50‐9.
2. Berg, J. and Rietz, T. (2003), “Prediction markets as decision support systems”, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 79‐93.
3. Bose, R. (2003), “Group support systems: technologies and products selection”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 No. 9, pp. 649‐56.
4. Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995), “Product development: past research; present findings, and future directions”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 343‐78.
5. Chan, N.T., Dahan, E., Kim, A., Lo, A.W. and Poggio, T. (2002), Securities Trading of Concepts (STOC), technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献