Author:
Nicolescu Ovidiu,Nicolescu Ciprian
Abstract
Purpose
– The paper aims to analyse typology of dynamic management studies and their specificity.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study analyses more than 200 studies published in English, French and Romanian management literature in the last 15 years. The data analysis follows a qualitative methodology.
Findings
– The study provides: four classifications of the dynamic managerial approach and their specificity; and the main advantages and limits of dynamic management analysis.
Research limitations/implications
– Further research should use the classifications, advantages and limits identified to investigate certain dynamic management analyses and formulate conclusions and recommendations for better dynamic managerial analysis.
Practical implications
– The paper highlights the specificity of different types of dynamic management analyses, that are often underestimated by researchers, professors, managers, students etc. The findings could be used by management practitioners to better understand the management evolution and performance of different organizations, to elaborate company strategy and policy, to change organizational culture a.s.o.
Social implications
– The increasement of social evaluation and prognosis quality.
Originality/value
– In the international management literature, the paper provides the first classification of dynamic management studies and their specificity and the synthesis of the main advantages and limits of dynamic management studies for both management theoreticians and practitioners. These elements are useful to increase the value of dynamic management studies and to improve management practices in organizations.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference101 articles.
1. Abell, A.
and
Oxbrow, N.
(2002), Competing with Knowledge, Library Association Publishing, London.
2. Acs, Y.J.
and
Amorós, J.E.
(2008), “Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 305-322.
3. Agbor, E.
(2008), “Creativity and innovation: the leadership dynamics”, Journal of Strategic Leadership, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 39-45.
4. Alonderiene, R.
(2010), “Enhancing informal learning to improve job satisfaction: perspective of SMEs managers in Lithuania”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 257-287.
5. Bold, O.
(2011), “A perspective on organizational change issue – case study on the application of two change models”, Review of International Comparative Management, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 871-882.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献