Accounting students' perceptions of a Learning Management System

Author:

Basioudis Ilias G.,de Lange Paul,Suwardy Themin,Wells Paul

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate student perceptions of the design features included in an “off the shelf” Learning Management System (LMS) in teaching undergraduate accounting students.Design/methodology/approachQuestionnaire responses from 846 accounting students studying in the UK, Australia and New Zealand provide international data to develop a model to explain student perception of the LMS.FindingsThe final model shows student satisfaction with the use of a LMS is positively associated with three variables: usefulness of lecture notes, bulletin boards and discussion forums, and other LMS tools. Further, the comparison of cultural differences of the three countries shows all students treat the provision of notes as a desirable attribute on a LMS. Findings also suggest that although students find the provision of materials over the LMS does not enhance student engagement in class, overall a comparison of the three countries shows all students treat the provision of notes as a desirable attribute of a LMS.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research should collect ethnicity data to enable an analysis of cultural influence on student perceptions of the LMS.Practical implicationsAs increased motivation to learn is found to contribute to improved achievement of learning outcomes, the study's findings have implications for faculty contemplating the adoption of a LMS in their courses. The findings specifically confirm that usefulness of lecture notes, use of bulletin/discussion boards, and other LMS tools are positively endorsed by students and hence increase their motivation to learn.Originality/valueThe current paper adds to the literature as the motivation to use and engage with LMSs by accounting students is not well understood.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference43 articles.

1. Adler, R.W., Milne, M.J. and Stringer, C.P. (2000), “Identifying and overcoming obstacles to learner‐centred approaches in tertiary accounting education: a field study and survey of accounting educators' perceptions”, Accounting Education: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 113‐34.

2. Antonis, K., Lampsas, P. and Prentza, S.J. (2008), “Adult distance learning using a web‐based learning management system: methodology and results”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4823, pp. 508‐19.

3. Arbaugh, J.B. and Duray, R. (2002), “Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web‐based courses”, Management Learning, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 331‐47.

4. ASTD (2006), Learning Circuits Glossary, American Society for Training & Development, available at: www.astd.org/LC/glossary.htm (accessed May 2009).

5. Atkinson, E., Conboy, I., Atkinson, J., Doods, A. and McInnis, C. (1996), Evaluation of the Open Learning Initiative: Tertiary, Access to a National Brokerage Agency, Center for the Studies of Higher Education, Melbourne.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3