The knowledge smiths: librarianship as craftship of knowledge

Author:

Mizrachi Yonathan

Abstract

Considers some of the reasons why we can no longer assume a progressive‐linear transition from facts and information provided by “the library” or by the “information professional” to a clearly focused (in terms of information needs) user as the “default” user‐library encounter. Examines why librarians and information specialists can no longer maintain their traditional, relatively passive role, and should aspire to become active participators in knowledge seeking. Librarians and information professionals may be called to intervene and assist users in context of higher levels of information processing (knowledge, understanding, reflection, and application). The main, and perhaps the somewhat revolutionary, implication of this paper is that the centre of gravity in the information professional’s practice and training should move from data and information retrieval and mediation to nothing short of acting as knowledge seekers, editors, and interpreters. Web‐like syntopicons and digital knowledge maps are presented and discussed as two promising intellectual instruments that librarians can implement in their quest for knowledge generation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference40 articles.

1. Belkin, N.J. (1980), “Anomalous stages of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval”, Canadian Journal of Information Science, Vol. 5, pp. 133‐44.

2. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N. and Brooks, H.M. (1982a), “ASK for information retrieval, Part I: background and theory”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 38, June, pp. 61‐71.

3. Belkin, N.J.,. Oddy, R.N and Brooks, H.M. (1982b), “ASK for information retrieval: Part II: background and theory”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 38, September, pp. 145‐6.

4. Candy, P.C. (1990), “How people learn to learn”, in Smith, R.M. and associates (Eds), Learning to Learn across the Life Span, The Jossey‐Bass Higher Education series, Jossey‐Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

5. Casson, M. (1997), Information and Organization: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3