Abstract
Purpose
A recent population-wide study for Germany, where credit lines on current accounts are available to 80 percent of the population, finds that overdraft debt is more likely for people who give intuitive but incorrect answers on a cognitive reflection test. This suggests that those consumers in debt have poorer cognitive reflection and, thus, lack of self-control. The Germany study finds that “surprisingly, the level of income does not play a central role.” The purpose of this paper is to discriminate the consumers in terms of their income by considering two experiments.
Design/methodology/approach
In the first (pilot) experiment, the authors do not discriminate consumers in terms of income and, as result, replicate the Germany study. In a follow-up experiment, which assembles a high-quality sample of high-income consumers, the authors find debt can no longer be explained by poor cognitive reflection.
Findings
Apparently, high-income consumers treat debt as mere leverage, as companies do.
Originality/value
Not all consumer indebtedness can be caused by lack of self-control. High-income consumers are likely to contract debt as leverage. This resembles rational risk taking.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Finance,Accounting
Reference32 articles.
1. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD;Psychological Bulletin,1998
2. The role of the frontal lobes in the regulation of cognitive development;Brain and Cognition,1992
3. Better than rational: evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand;American Economic Review,1994
4. Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: unifying themes for educational psychology;Educational Psychology Review,1999
5. Knowing what not to do: financial literacy and consumer credit choices,2014
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献