A theory of information overload applied to perfectly efficient financial markets

Author:

Pernagallo GiuseppeORCID,Torrisi Benedetto

Abstract

PurposeIn the era of big data investors deal every day with a huge flow of information. Given a model populated by economic agents with limited computational capacity, the paper shows how “too much” information could cause financial markets to depart from the assumption of informational efficiency. The purpose of the paper is to show that as information increases, at some point the efficient market hypothesis ceases to be true. In general, the hypothesis cannot be maintained if the use of the maximum amount of information is not optimal for investors.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a model of cognitive heterogeneity to show the inadequacy of the notion of market efficiency in the modern society of big data.FindingsTheorem 1 proves that as information grows, agents' processing capacities do not, so at some point there will be an amount of information that no one can fully use. The introduction of computer-based processing techniques can restore efficiency, however, also machines are bounded. This means that as the amount of information increases, even in the presence of non-human techniques, at some point it will no longer be possible to process further information.Practical implicationsThis paper explains why investors very often prefer heuristics to complex strategies.Originality/valueThis is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first model that uses information overload to prove informational inefficiency. This paper links big data to informational efficiency, whereas Theorem 1 proves that the old notion of efficiency is not well-founded because it relies on unlimited processing capacities of economic agents.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Finance,Accounting

Reference43 articles.

1. Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information displays;Journal of Behavioral Finance,2005

2. Annuities, financial literacy and information overload;Pension Research Council WP 2010-33,2010

3. The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1970

4. Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality;American Economic Review,1994

5. Beyond prediction: using big data for policy problems;Science,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3