The agency dilemma in anti-money laundering regulation

Author:

Naheem Mohammed Ahmad

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive theoretical framework that can be applied to the application of anti-money laundering (AML) regulation within the banking sector. Design/methodology/approach The paper is linked to a PhD study to be published in Winter 2015/Spring 2016 that looks at trade-based money laundering and risk assessment using an agent–principal relationship to explain the underlying relationships affected by regulation in a ML context. Findings The paper finds that imposing regulation and assuming that the banking sector is simply an arm of law enforcement is not an effective approach and could actually contribute toward developing ML schemes that are too complex to be easily detected. Practical implications The paper has implications for the banking, regulatory and law enforcement areas involved in ML and its detection. Originality/value The paper offers originality in providing a comprehensive multi-agency framework that is cognisant of all factors affected by AML regulation. It extends beyond existing work that has offered agency insights into various sectors of AML and ML partners.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration

Reference48 articles.

1. Bachelor, L. (2014), “HSBC accused of closing UK bank accounts held by Syrians”, available at: http://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/aug/08/hsbc-accused-closing-bank-accounts-syrians (accessed 22 December 2015).

2. Chittum, R. (2015), “Diamond dealers in deep trouble as bank documents shine light on secret way”, available at: http://www.icij.org/project/swiss-leaks/diamond-dealers-deep-trouble-bank-documents-shine-light-secret-ways (accessed 20 December 2015).

3. Coindesk (2014), “Silk road timeline”, available at: http://www.coindesk.com/silk-road-timeline/ (accessed 10 November 2015).

4. AML compliance for foreign correspondent accounts: a primer on beneficial ownership requirements and other challenges;Journal of Investment Compliance,2014

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3