Author:
Antoncic Bostjan,Auer Antoncic Jasna,Aaltonen Heli Marketta
Abstract
Purpose
– New firm creation plays an important role in economic development and growth. Despite the recognized importance of general and entrepreneurial self-efficacy for entrepreneurship, new firm creation, and growth, research has devoted minimal attention to explicitly investigating the relationship between marketing self-efficacy and firm creation. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between marketing self-efficacy and firm creation.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data were collected in two European countries (Finland and Slovenia). Regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis.
Findings
– The findings of this study demonstrate that marketing self-efficacy makes a difference in firm creation.
Research limitations/implications
– The model advanced in this study is partial and not comprehensive. Gaining insights into marketing self-efficacy-based firm creation in established economies of northern Europe and transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe can be valuable for broadening the new firm formation research and improving marketing self-efficacy-related practices in these countries.
Practical implications
– Practitioners and policymakers need to be aware that marketing self-efficacy can be an important driver of new firm creation.
Social implications
– It is suggested that economic policymakers make funds available or channel investments into training and education in marketing abilities in elementary, middle, higher, and university education levels in order to increase marketing self-efficacy levels in the population.
Originality/value
– This study contributes to a better understanding of firm creation induced by marketing self-efficacy by developing and testing a normative model.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference63 articles.
1. Ahearne, M.
,
Mathieu, J.
and
Rapp, A.
(2005), “To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance”,
Journal of Applied Psychology
, Vol. 90 No. 5, pp. 945-955.
2. Antoncic, B.
and
Hisrich, R.D.
(2003), “Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept”,
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 7-24.
3. Antoncic, B.
and
Hisrich, R.D.
(2004), “Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation”,
Journal of Management Development
, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 518-550.
4. Antoncic, B.
,
Hvalic Erzetic, B.
,
Zorn, O.
and
Hisrich, R.D.
(2007), “Entrepreneurship education: non-linearity in the satisfaction-continuation relationship”,
Management
, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 101-119.
5. Baker, W.E.
and
Sinkula, J.M.
(2009), “The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses”,
Journal of Small Business Management
, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 443-464.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献