Participatory action research in learning commons design planning

Author:

Brown‐Sica Margaret,Sobel Karen,Rogers Erika

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to document the process the Auraria Library went through to plan research methods to produce information for their learning commons project.Design/methodology/approachThe paper provides an overview and the results of one library's planning methods using user‐centered and participatory action research (PAR) principles. It includes a literature review and data gathered from several information gathering sessions. It also discusses useful resources and ideologies found outside the field of library science, such as “placemaking” and the concept of “third place.”FindingsAdopting values that honor user‐centered, evidence‐based decision making is a change that must include the whole library, as well as its users. When enough time is spent to include a broad spectrum of feedback you can get a lot of valuable evidence, even during a planning period.Originality/valueThe paper could be useful to libraries who are examining their services, environment, and technology. It is of interest to libraries that want to use user‐centered design and PAR in their work.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference23 articles.

1. Bailey, D.R. and Tierney, B.G. (2006), Transforming Library Service through Information Commons: Case Studies for the Digital Age, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.

2. Beagle, D.R. (2004), “From information commons to learning commons”, available at: www.usc.edu/isd/libraries/locations/leavey/news/conference/presentations/presentations_9‐16/Beagle_Information_Commons_to_Learning.pdf (accessed September 10, 2009).

3. Beagle, D.R. (2006), Information Commons Handbook, Neal‐Schuman, New York, NY.

4. Bell, F. (2007), “Service‐learning in LIS education: the case of the University of Natal's Inadi initiative”, South African Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 147‐55.

5. Bennett, S. (2008), “Editorial: the information or the learning commons: which will we have?”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 183‐5.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3