Author:
Mckinnon Lashawnda,Istook Cynthia L.
Abstract
Describes research designed to examine the effects of subject positioning on the accuracy of body scan data. A body measurement system developed by the Textile Clothing Technology Corporation was used to acquire two scans from each of 72 subjects. The subjects were instructed to continue to breathe normally and stand with their feet shoulder‐width apart. The two scans were compared and statistical analysis was performed to determine the precision of the results and whether this lack of standardization affected the data. Physical measurements were also obtained from each subject and served as a basis for comparison to the scanned measurements. Since physical measurements are the current accepted “true value”, these measurements determined the level of accuracy of scanned data. Three separate scans of 72 different subjects were taken at various levels of breathing and at various foot positions to determine the effect of the variables. This study certainly indicates that respiration and foot placement has a significant effect on body scan data. It was established that the scan data rendered by the software does have precision, but lacks accuracy when compared against physical measurements. This may be owing to the inaccuracies of the physical measurement process or to differences in measurement location between the anthropometrist and the 3D measurement extraction software. Information detailing the level of accuracy and precision that can be obtained with scanning software and how respiration and subject positioning can affect the data are included.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference15 articles.
1. CogniTens, (2000), available at: www.cognitens.com
2. Cyberware (2000), available at: www.cyberware.com
3. Daanen, H., Brunsman, M. and Robinette, K. (1997), “Reducing movement artifacts in whole body scanning”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, pp. 262‐5.
4. Demers, M., Hurley, J. and Wulpern, R. (1997), “Three dimensional surface capture for body measurement using projected sinusoidal patterns”, SPIE, Vol. 3023, pp. 12‐25.
5. Gordon, C. and Bradtmiller, B. (1996), “Interobserver error in a large scale anthropometric survey”, American Journal of Human Biology, Vol. 4, pp. 253‐63.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献