An exploration of trust and shared values in UK defence supply networks

Author:

Tatham Peter

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to develop a “line of sight” between improved military capability through supply network effectiveness to trust and shared values, and test the proposition that the effectiveness of the UK's military supply network (SN) will reflect the extent of the shared values within that network.Design/methodology/approachUsing a three unit case study, the extent of the shared values is tested using a computer aided text analysis technique and an amended version of the Kuhn and McPartland Twenty Statements Test.FindingsThe research was unable to demonstrate alignment between higher levels of shared values and SN effectiveness. This may reflect the marked differences between commercial SNs which incorporate an assumption of near total elasticity of supply and aim at “on time in full” delivery, and their military counterparts which, not least for budgetary constraint reasons, do not have the same drivers of performance.Research limitations/implicationsFurther investigation should be undertaken to examine the generalisability of the research findings both within the UK and internationally.Practical implicationsThe research underlines the caution that should be exercised when attempting to migrate commercial SN management thinking to a military environment.Originality/valueNotwithstanding the vast sums expended on the provision of defence logistics, there is only very limited consideration of how best to achieve the appropriate balance between efficiency (low cost – especially in peacetime) and effectiveness (life saving – especially in war). This research offers some early insights using two novel techniques that represent valuable alternative means of understanding the impact of issues such as trust and shared values within SNs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference47 articles.

1. Alm, R.M., Carroll, W.F. and Welty, G.A. (1972), “The internal validity of the Kuhn‐McPartland TST”, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, pp. 190‐193, available at: www.wright.edu/∼gordon.welty/Kuhn_72.htm (accessed 19 April 2008).

2. Blackman, H. (2005), “Battlegroup logistics in warfighting operations in Iraq 2003”, Military Logistics International, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 11‐14.

3. Bowersox, D.J. (1990), “The strategic benefits of logistic alliances”, Harvard Business Review, July/August, pp. 36‐45.

4. Bradley, S.P. and Nolan, R.L. (1998), Sense & Respond, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

5. Christopher, M.G. and Holweg, M. (2011), “‘Supply chain 2.0’: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 63‐82.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3