Abstract
Purpose
The influence of security practices is increasingly common in the supply chain management and logistics literature. However, an under-researched area exists within the logistics service provider (LSP) selection process. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a security capability into the LSP selection process. Specifically, this research seeks to understand partner willingness to compensate and collaborate with service providers that possess a security capability.
Design/methodology/approach
Adaptive choice modeling is adopted to assess the influence of a security capability in the LSP selection process. This study represents the first use of this method in supply chain management and logistics research. Cluster analysis is also performed to uncover specific buyer segments along with traditional regression-based significance testing and counting analysis.
Findings
The findings indicate that security can have an important influence on the LSP selection process. In particular, the findings note a willingness to pay for a security capability in LSP selection. Applying segmentation techniques to the findings, three LSP buying segments are determined, each placing different importance and value on LSP capabilities.
Practical implications
This research notes an ongoing provider deficiency in security offerings. Partner firms sometimes maintain a cost focus, but others show a willingness to pay higher prices for access to partners with a security capability. Key practitioner findings include the need to include security with other traditional selection variables. The study walks the researcher and manager through the development of segments based on LSP capabilities.
Originality/value
This manuscript investigates logistic service provider selection. The authors detail an advanced form of conjoint analysis, adaptive conjoint modeling, for first time consideration. Additionally, this is the first study to integrate security into the LSP selection process. This is also the first study to identify a willingness to pay for a security capability.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation
Reference69 articles.
1. Motor carriers’ and shippers’ perceptions of the carrier choice decision;Logistics and Transportation Review,1991
2. Supply chain collaboration, integration, and relational technology: how complex operant resources increase performance outcomes;Journal of Business Logistics,2014
3. Supply chain security orientation: conceptual development and a proposed framework;The International Journal of Logistics Management,2008
4. Autry, C.W. and Sanders, N. (2009), “Supply chain security: a dynamic capabilities approach”, in Zsidisin, G.A. and Ritchie, B. (Eds), Supply Chain Risk: International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 124, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 307-329.
5. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage;Journal of Management,1991
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献