Author:
Ahmed Hasib,Hassan M. Kabir,Rayfield Blake
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyze whether investors perceive the issuance of sukuk differently than they do in case of conventional bonds, by using event study with superior data. Then, it analyzes whether financial characteristics of issuers can explain the abnormal return and likelihood of sukuk issuance. Finally, the paper proposes a testable model explaining the investor reaction.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper uses market model event study to assess investor reaction to the issuance of sukuk. Then, linear and logistic regressions are used to test whether financial characteristics of issuers can explain the abnormal return and likelihood of sukuk issuance. To investigate the differences between sukuk issuers and bond issuers, this paper tests the difference in means of issuer characteristics. Finally, the sample is subdivided into good and bad firm prospects according to dividend/earnings ratio and book-to-market ratio. The subdivisions are used to test the proposed model explaining the investor reaction.
Findings
The study finds that a large variety of firms issues sukuk. The event study reports significant negative abnormal returns around the announcement date of sukuk issuance. The study also reveals that the earning prospect of issuer firms affect the investor reaction. Firms with lower earning prospect receive a negative reaction from the investors. Also, smaller, or financially unhealthy firms are more likely to issue sukuk. Smaller and riskier firms issue sukuk, because participation in the market is less constrained. In other words, the risk-sharing nature of sukuk might imply that the firm is not confident about the future prospect. However, if the firm has good earnings prospects, investors react to the issuance of sukuk negatively.
Research limitations/implications
Reliability and availability of data is a hurdle to test the investor reaction model. As more data become available, the models implications can be further tested.
Originality/value
This paper uses the most complete set of data to study sukuk, making it the most selection bias-free and complete study. Moreover, the proposed investor reaction model will enrich the theory.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Finance
Reference16 articles.
1. Are Islamic bonds different from conventional bonds? International evidence from capital market tests;Borsa Istanbul Review,2013
2. Cakir, S. and Raei, F. (2007), “Sukuk vs Eurobonds: is there a difference in value-at-risk?”, IMF working papers, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1-20, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1087156 (accessed April 4, 2017).
3. Godlewski, C.J., Turk, R. and Weill, L. (2010), “Are Islamic investment certificates special? Evidence on the post-announcement performance of Sukuk issues”, LaRGE Working Paper No. 2010-05, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1594716; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1594716 (accessed April 5, 2010).
4. Sukuk vs conventional bonds: a stock market perspective;Journal of Comparative Economics,2013
5. Do the type of sukuk and choice of Shari’a scholar matter?;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2016
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献