Process improvement through economically driven routing of instances

Author:

Bolsinger Manuel,Elsäßer Anna,Helm Caroline,Röglinger Maximilian

Abstract

Purpose – Process improvement is a fundamental activity of the business process management (BPM) lifecycle. However, practitioners still lack concrete guidance and adequate objectives for process improvement. Moreover, improvement projects typically tie up considerable amounts of capital and are very risky. Thus, more guidance is needed on how to derive concrete recommendations for process improvement in a goal-oriented manner. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The authors propose a decision model that determines along which paths the instances of a process should be routed to maximize the value contribution of the process. To do so, the decision model requires a process model and a set of historical process instances as inputs. Findings – The decision model builds on the idea that only the parameters of the process, i.e., the values according to which it is decided on which path an instance traverses the process, can be modified, without altering the structure of the process. The decision model determines the parameter setting that maximizes the value contribution of the process, which is measured in terms of the expected cash flow of the process. When determining the optimal parameter setting, the decision model considers that different instances and paths have different cash flow effects. Practical implications – The authors prototypically implemented the decision model and report on the insights from a demonstration example that is based on the order verification process of an IT distributor. Originality/value – The decision model complements existing approaches to process improvement as it reveals additional improvement potential by focussing on the decision points in a process without altering the structure of the process. The decision model also enables identifying an optimal parameter setting, as a concrete recommendation for process improvement, in line with the principles of value-based BPM.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference47 articles.

1. Afflerbach, P. , Kastner, G. , Krause, F. and Röglinger, M. (2013), “An optimization model for valuating process flexibility”, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS, Milan, December 15-18.

2. Betts, A. , Meadows, M. and Walley, P. (2000), “Call centre capacity management”, Interntional Journal of Service Industry Management , Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 185-196.

3. Biswal, P.C. (2005), Discrete Mathematics and Graph Theory , Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi.

4. Bolsinger, M. (2014), “Bringing value-based business process management to the operational process level”, appears in Information Systems and e-Business Management, available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10257-014-0248-1

5. Braunwarth, K. , Kaiser, M. and Müller, A. (2010), “Economic evaluation and optimization of the degree of automation in insurance processes”, Business & Information Systems Engineering , Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 29-39.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3