Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate how trade openness affects the structural vulnerability of developing countries. The analysis is conducted on both the entire sample of 105 countries as well as two sub-samples, namely least developed countries (LDCs) and non-LDCs.
Design/methodology/approach
– To perform the analysis, the author employs fixed-effects (within) regressions supplemented by instrumental variables technique based on the two-step generalized methods of moments approach.
Findings
– The author finds empirical evidence that although trade policy liberalization reduces the structural vulnerability on the entire sample developing countries, no statistically significant effect of such liberalization is obtained either on LDCs or non-LDCs. However, trade policy liberalization appears to reduce countries’ exposure to shocks, result that applies to the entire sample as well as the two sub-samples. The author also observes that trade policy liberalization exerts no (statistically) significant effect on the size of shocks that affect developing countries, result that applies to both the full sample and the sub-samples of LDCs and non-LDCs.
Research limitations/implications
– In the absence of a well-established theoretical framework on how trade openness affects the structural vulnerability of developing, the author adopts a pragmatic approach by drawing upon many insights of Loayza and Raddatz (2007) who study the structural determinants of external vulnerability.
Practical implications
– Developing countries in general and LDCs in particular could address their structural weaknesses by making optimal use of their trade policies. In particular, they could better use the flexibilities available to them in provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’ Agreements. In this respect, the international community, notably donors of the developed world has a key role to play.
Originality/value
– This is the first study exploring how trade openness, capturing here through trade policy liberalization affects the structural vulnerability of developing countries.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference57 articles.
1. Agosin, R.
,
Alvarez, R.
and
Bravo-Ortega, C.
(2012), “Determinants of export diversification around the world: 1962-2000”,
The World Economy
, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 295-315.
2. Baltagi, B.H.
(2002),
Econometrics
, 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
3. Baltagi, B.H.
,
Demetriades, P.O.
and
Law, S.K.
(2009), “Financial development and openness: evidence from panel data”,
Journal of Development Economics
, Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 285-296.
4. Baritto, F.
(2008), “‘Disasters, vulnerability and resilience from a macro-economic perspective: lessons from the empirical evidence”, background paper for the 2009 ISDR Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Geneva.
5. Beck, T.
,
Demirgüç-Kunt, A.
and
Ross, L.
(2000), “A new database on financial development and structure”,
World Bank Economic Review
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 597-605.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献