Abstract
PurposeThe purpose is to explore the different and often contradictory perceptions individual managers have about corporate sustainability within a global retailer.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative case study method is used, including interviews and document studies. The authors study the global retailer IKEA. In total the authors have interviewed respondents on both the global level and the country level, within the sustainability organization as well as corporate, sales and communication management. The study includes managers in Sweden, the UK and Germany.FindingsThe research is based on institutional theory, focusing upon cognitive and normative aspects; the authors propose that managers may have a proactive, forceful view on sustainability or a reactive view. These need to coexist. The authors also show how global retailers can balance sustainability goals with other business considerations, as well as about the implications of the sustainability approach for the retailer's business model.Practical implicationsRetail managers need to recognize and integrate the contradictory views on sustainability that managers hold. The authors show how sustainability can be given different impact depending on the context and the strategic issue it is linked to.Originality/valueMost studies have focused on how sustainability is managed on an organizational level and how different goals can co-exist. The authors’ focus is on individual managers and their perceptions of sustainability – what it includes, how they want to manage sustainability issues, and the priority it should be given.
Subject
Business and International Management,Marketing
Reference71 articles.
1. Diverging expectations in buyer-seller relationships: institutional contexts and relationship norms;Industrial Marketing Management,2009
2. Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations;Journal of Management Studies,2001
3. The corporate challenges of sustainable development;The Academy of Management Executive,2002
4. Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development;Strategic Management Journal,2005
5. Similar but not the same: differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility;The Academy of Management Annals,2017
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献