Abstract
PurposeRecent research suggests that organizations cycle through a small set of possible configurations. Each buying center as an informal organization within one of these four viable types of structure will exhibit distinct configuration attributes. Describing and predicting the buying center's configuration as indicated by organizational structure are the purpose of this research.Design/methodology/approachData collected via mail survey are used to classify organizations into hypothesized segments via K‐means cluster analysis. Buying center structure is contrasted and tested for differences using MANOVA, MDA, and post hoc t‐tests.FindingsThe extensivity or level of participation in the buying center is significantly related to the type of organization. Organizational formalization and centralization are consistently related to the formalization and centrality of the buying center.Research limitations/implicationsThe generalizability of the findings is limited as the sample is from a single US geographical area. Buying center participation and structure may be a function of the product. Research findings are limited to a specific service.Practical implicationsAwareness of the structure of the buying center is useful for marketing and sales managers. This knowledge can guide their efforts to allocate scarce sales resources at appropriate levels for business customers.Originality/valueThis paper closes a gap in the business‐to‐business marketing literature about antecedents to the buying center's structure.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference57 articles.
1. Anderson, N.A. and Born, A.W. (2000), “Complexity and change: two ‘semantic tricks’ in the triumphant oscillating organization”, Systematic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 297‐328.
2. Bahrani, H.H. (1992), “The emerging flexible organization: perspectives from Silicon Valley”, California Management Review, Vol. 34, pp. 33‐52.
3. Barclay, D.W. (1991), “Interdepartmental conflict in organizational buying: the impact of the organizational context”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28 No. 2, p. 145.
4. Barlow, H.A. and Burke, M.E. (1999), “The organization as an information system: signposts for new investigations”, East European Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 549‐56.
5. Baron, J.N., Burton, M.D. and Hannan, M. (1999), “Engineering bureaucracy: the genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in high‐technology firms”, Journal of Law Economics and Organizations, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1‐41.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献