Abstract
Purpose
This research aims to study some national government success factors at controlling the first wave of COVID-19. The author placed special attention on democracy-related factors.
Design/methodology/approach
A sample of 156 countries were studied during the first half of 2020 and their government effectiveness was analyzed regarding six dependent variables, namely, the government’s daily average of stringency index, the outbreak response time, the daily average of cases and deaths per million, the daily average of tests per thousand and the mortality rate.
Findings
The study finds that countries with the highest democracy indexes applied the softest social constraints measured by the daily average stringency index. These countries suffered a more severe pandemic impact confirmed by the highest daily averages of cases and deaths per million and the highest mortality rate. Similarly, these countries exhibited the shortest outbreak response time and the most extensive daily average tests per thousand.
Research limitations/implications
The limitations of this study include lack of universal consensus for the dependent variables’ definitions, inconsistencies in how countries record COVID-19 deaths, differences in testing efforts, variances on health services, unreliable data from less democratic countries and so on.
Originality/value
To the best of the author’s knowledge, no previous research paper has studied the explanatory power of the author selected government success factors at controlling the first wave of COVID-19, which constitutes this study’s original contribution.
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Public Administration
Reference46 articles.
1. Afzal, M. (2020), “The pandemic deals a blow to Pakistan’s democracy,” BROOKINGS, available at: www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/08/06/the-pandemic-deals-a-blow-to-pakistans-democracy/ (accessed 6 August 2020).
2. Aleem, Z. (2020), “Protesters across Thailand call for new elections following the arrest of pro-democracy activists,” Vox, available at: www.vox.com/world/2020/8/9/21360840/thailand-protests-democracy-arrests-nampa-jadnok (accessed 9 August 2020).
3. Regime type and COVID-19 response;FIIB Business Review,2020
4. Amat, F. Arenas, A. Falcó-Gimeno, A. and Muñoz, J. (2020), “Pandemics meet democracy. Experimental evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Spain”, working paper, available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/dkusw/ (accessed 14 August 2020).
5. Ashraf, B.N. (2020), “Devastation caused by COVID-19: is democracy to blame?”, Working Paper. School of Finance, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3596009_code2213785.pdf?abstractid=3596009&mirid=1 (accessed 10 August 2020).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献