Developing reflexive corporate leadership

Author:

Barratt Ruth,Korac‐Kakabadse Nada

Abstract

In recent decades, there have been far too many examples of the world’s business being not sufficiently attentive to governance, with little foresight as to emerging consequences, such as major oil spills, chemical leaks and Enron. Many leaders do not seem to address issues beyond short‐term profitability. The emerging worldwide view is that corporations need to adopt governance models that are more holistic in their approach, pluralistic in representing varying interests, egalitarian in the treatment of stakeholders and essentially more collaborative in their mode of operation. Corporate leaders must emerge more cognitively, emotively and behaviourally reflexive. Such reflexivity comes through the application of practical wisdom to facilitate corporate change. Fully realising value from the board of directors as the guide of the organisation, and specifically from non executive directors (NEDs) is crucial to enduring sustainable change. NEDs’ abilities to span the boundary between the needs and wants of a variety of legitimate stakeholders and the survival requirements of the firm poses a unique management development challenge. NEDs who effectively provide holistic and reflexive insight into the challenges of corporate systems are likely to enhance organisational, societal and environmental wellbeing. Through reflexivity, well skilled and capable NEDs can stimulate the desire to change in the leadership of the organisation and may, as such, prevent future crisis. Towards this end, this presentation will examine how NEDs can leverage their role to promote corporate social performance.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference28 articles.

1. Aldrich, H. and Herker, D. (1977), “Boundary spanning roles and organisation structure”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, pp. 217‐30.

2. Boyd, C. (1996), “Ethics and corporate governance: the issues raised by the Cadbury Report”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 15, pp. 167‐82.

3. Cadbury, A. (1992), The Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, (Cadbury Report), Gee Publishing, London.

4. Davis, H.J., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L. (1997), “Toward a stewardship theory of management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 20 (8).

5. Deetz, S. (1992), Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonisation, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3