Author:
Arevalo Jorge A.,Fallon Francis T.
Abstract
PurposeThe changing nature of the interaction between multilateral institutions and the private sector, such as the one extended by the United Nations (UN) through the Global Compact, has raised profound questions about authority and legitimacy in international relations. This paper seeks to provide the criteria for fairly assessing corporate citizenship initiatives as these form an integral part of the changing nature of corporate governance.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses the Global Compact's 2007 annual review as a point of reference and critical evaluation. The paper refers to the gap found among participants and their inability to answer to the relevant questions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as originally set forth by the UN.FindingsThere has been a substantial increase in both scale and impact by this type of private sector initiative: a 50‐fold growth in just seven years – unlike any other international collaborative partnership. Based on the assessment, the ongoing question regarding its legitimacy, its operationality and efficiency for improving global governance still remains a challenge at large.Originality/valueEmpirical research on the impact, accountability, challenges and successes of the Global Compact is limited. The aim of this study is to progress understanding of both the limitations on, and opportunities for, the role of business in global governance when CSR is used as an international tool for community involvement. To this end, in addition to a critique of the UNGC's self‐assessment, the paper proposes a researcher's model for assessing corporate citizenship initiatives.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference19 articles.
1. Benner, T., Reinicke, W. and Witte, J. (2004), “Multisectoral networks in global governance: towards a pluralistic system of accountability”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 191‐210.
2. Bull, B., Boas, M. and McNeill, D. (2004), “Private sector influence in the multilateral system: a changing structure of world governance”, Global Governance, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 459‐98.
3. Edwards, M. (2000), NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance, The Foreign Policy Centre, London.
4. Forman, S. and Segaar, D. (2006), “New coalitions for global governance: the changing dynamics of multilateralism”, Global Governance, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 205‐25.
5. Higgott, R., Underhill, G. and Bieler, A. (2000), Non‐State Actors and Authority in the Global System, Routledge, London.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献