Knowledge organisation in institutional repositories: a case study on policies and procedures manuals in the Ibero-American environment

Author:

Bueno de la Fuente Gema,Agustín-Lacruz Carmen,Fujita Mariângela Spotti Lopes,Terra Ana Lúcia

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyse the recommendations on knowledge organisation from guidelines, policies and procedure manuals of a sample of institutional repositories and networks within the Latin American area and observe the level of follow-up of international guidelines. Design/methodology/approach Presented is an exploratory and descriptive study of repositories’ professional documents. This study comprised four steps: definition of convenience sample; development of data codebook; coding of data; and analysis of data and conclusions drawing. The convenience sample includes representative sources at three levels: local institutional repositories, national aggregators and international network and aggregators. The codebook gathers information from the repositories’ sample, such as institutional rules and procedure manuals openly available, or recommendations on the use of controlled vocabularies. Findings The results indicate that at the local repository level, the use of controlled vocabularies is not regulated, leaving the choice of terms to the authors’ discretion. It results in a set of unstructured keywords, not standardised terms, mixing subject terms with other authorities on persons, institutions or places. National aggregators do not regulate these issues either and limit to pointing to international guidelines and policies, which simply recommend the use of controlled vocabularies, using URIs to facilitate interoperability. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in identifying how the principles of knowledge organisation are effectively applied by institutional repositories, at local, national and international levels.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference29 articles.

1. Repositório digital: a delimitação de um conceito por meio de mapa conceitual;Informação@Profissões,2021

2. A conversão de registros na implantação de repositórios institucionais: o caso do repositório institucional UNESP,2014

3. COAR community framework for best practices in repositories (version 1), confederation of open access repositories, Zenodo;COAR,2020

4. COAR (2021), “COAR repository toolkit, confederation of open access repositories”, available at: www.coar-repositories.org/news-updates/coar-repository-toolkit

5. COAR (2022), “COAR community framework for best practices in repositories (version 2), confederation of open access repositories”, available at: www.coar-repositories.org/coar-community-framework-for-good-practices-in-repositories/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3