Dealing with risk in stakeholder dialog: identification of risk indicators in a public service media organization's conversation and discourse with citizens

Author:

Schwägerl ChristianORCID,Stücheli-Herlach Peter,Dreesen Philipp,Krasselt Julia

Abstract

PurposeThis study operationalizes risks in stakeholder dialog (SD). It conceptualizes SD as co-produced organizational discourse and examines the capacities of organizers' and stakeholders' practices to create a shared understanding of an organization’s risks to their mutual benefit. The meetings and online forum of a German public service media (PSM) organization were used as a case study.Design/methodology/approachThe authors applied corpus-driven linguistic discourse analysis (topic modeling) to analyze citizens' (n = 2,452) forum posts (n = 14,744). Conversation analysis was used to examine video-recorded online meetings.FindingsOrganizers suspended actors' reciprocity in meetings. In the forums, topics emerged autonomously. Citizens' articulation of their identities was more diverse than the categories the organizer provided, and organizers did not respond to the autonomous emergence of contextualizations of citizens' perceptions of PSM performance in relation to their identities. The results suggest that risks arise from interactionally achieved occasions that prevent reasoned agreement and from actors' practices, which constituted autonomous discursive formations of topics and identities in the forums.Originality/valueThis study disentangles actors' practices, mutuality orientation and risk enactment during SD. It advances the methodological knowledge of strategic communication research on SD, utilizing social constructivist research methods to examine the contingencies of organization-stakeholder interaction in SD.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference61 articles.

1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2021), “ARD-Zukunftsdialog Bericht 2021”, [“ARD future dialogue report 2021”], Westdeutscher Rundfunk Köln, available at: https://www.daserste.de/ard/die-ard/spezial/ARD-Zukunftsdialog-Bericht-2021-100.pdf (accessed 18 April 2023).

2. Latent dirichlet allocation;Journal of Machine Learning Research: JMLR,2003

3. Stakeholder dialogue as agonistic deliberation: exploring the role of conflict and self-interest in business-NGO interaction;Business Ethics Quarterly,2020

4. Buhrow, T. (2021), “Wo die ARD im Jahr 2030 steht”, [“Where ARD stands in 2030”], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, available at: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/wdr-intendant-tom-buhrow-wo-die-ard-im-jahr-2030-steht-17258121.html (accessed 18 April 2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3