Fortune 100 companies’ Facebook strategies: corporate ability versus social responsibility

Author:

Kim Sora,Kim Soo-Yeon,Hoon Sung Kang

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how Fortune 100 companies are using Facebook (FB) in terms of employing corporate ability (CA), corporate social responsibility (CSR), and hybrid communication strategies, meeting different stakeholders’ expectations, and incorporating interactivity components into social media. Design/methodology/approach – A quantitative content analysis was used to examine a total of 1,486 corporate FB postings. Findings Fortune 100 companies predominantly employed a CA strategy over a CSR strategy or a hybrid strategy. They prioritize customers’ needs over other stakeholders’ (e.g. stockholders and community members) on FB. FB fans are more likely to post “like” when companies personalize their FB messages. Seeking specific action-oriented participation on FB increased the frequencies of “like” and “comment,” whereas using the generic terms like “try” or “learn” decreased such frequencies. Finally, the frequencies of fans posting “like” and “comment” are affected by how often companies responded to fans’ postings and not influenced by how often companies feed new FB updates to fans. Originality/value – This study provides a benchmark case of how corporations are using a mainstream social media outlet to engage different stakeholders. It helps to assess the current status of public relations communication strategies on the mainstream social networking site. Companies can increase public engagement and response on social media through more personalized messages and techniques to encourage active participation and dialogue.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference51 articles.

1. Bates, L. and Callison, C. (2008), “Effect of company affiliation on credibility in the blogosphere”, paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Conference, Chicago, IL, August 6-9.

2. Beauchamp, M.B. (2013), “Don’t invade my personal space: facebook’s advertising dilemma”, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 91-96.

3. Biehal, G.J. and Sheinin, D.A. (2007). “The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 12-25.

4. Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A. (1997), “The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 68-84.

5. Castaldo, S. , Perrini, F. , Misani, N. and Tencati, A. (2009), “The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: the case of fair trade products”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 1-15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3