Essential distinctiveness: strategic alternatives in updating the business core curriculum

Author:

Alstete Jeffrey W.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to propose the use of specific strategic management tools for identifying opportunities for gaining competitive advantage in the business core curricula offered at colleges and universities.Design/methodology/approachA brief review of the literature on business core curriculum innovation and change is examined, and strategic management concepts are used to compare with a set of competitive peer institutions. The techniques employed in the analysis include a representative weighted competitive strength assessment and a strategic group map in an example case analysis.FindingsThe results show that in this particular sample competitive environment, a business core course program could gain a competitive lead over rivals by improving innovation and distinctiveness in the core program content and/or teaching methods.Research limitations/implicationsThe concepts proposed in this paper are limited by the measures that are selected, the subjective level of importance weights assigned by the users to the measures, the possible overlap among some measures, and the use of a single case with five selected peer institutions.Practical implicationsThere is potential usefulness of these strategic management analytical tools in the field of higher education by practitioners and researchers to examine the fundamental business core curricula in a systematic manner. The approach proposed could be used for other practical analyses of educational programs, organizational processes and services.Social implicationsConsidering that higher education courses and degree programs are important to individuals, organizations, and society at large, this proposed adaption of business strategic management concepts by educators could have a positive impact by enabling colleges and universities to discover and implement more opportunities for distinctiveness and improvement.Originality/valueWhile there are previous research journal articles describing the importance of making changes to business core curricula and programs in today's rapidly changing environment, this paper offers practical and methodical analytical tools that administrators, faculty members and committee leaders can use for informed decision making.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference26 articles.

1. AACSB (2011), “Best practices in curriculum redesign”, BizEd, Vol. 10, AACSB International, Tampa, FL, pp. 48‐50.

2. AACSB (2012), “Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation”, available at: www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards‐busn‐jan2012.pdf (accessed 12 May 2012).

3. Alstete, J.W. (1996), Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practices to Improve Quality, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

4. Alstete, J.W. (2000), Post‐Tenure Faculty Development: Building a System of Faculty Improvement and Appreciation, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

5. Alstete, J.W. (2004), Accreditation Matters: Achieving Academic Recognition and Renewal, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3