Author:
Bassnett Susan,Frandsen Ann-Christine,Hoskin Keith
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate accounting as first visible-sign statement form, and also as the first writing, and analyse its systematic differences, syntactic and semantic, from subsequent speech-following (glottographic) writing forms. The authors consider how accounting as non-glottographic (and so “unspeakable”) writing form renders “glottography” a “subsystem of writing” (Hyman, 2006), while initiating a mode of veridiction which always and only names and counts, silently and synoptically. The authors also consider the translation of this statement form into the graphs, charts, equations, etc., which are central to the making of modern scientific truth claims, and to remaking the boundaries of “languaging” and translatability.
Design/methodology/approach
As a historical–theoretical study, this draws on work reconceptualising writing vs speech (e.g. Harris, 1986; 2000), the statement vs the word (e.g. Foucault, 1972/2002) and the parameters of translation (e.g. Littau, 2016) to re-think the conceptual significance of accounting as constitutive of our “literate modes” of thinking, acting and “languaging in general”.
Findings
Specific reflections are offered on how the accounting statement, as mathematically regularised naming of what “ought” to be counted, is then evaluated against what is counted, thus generating a first discourse of the norm and a first accounting-based apparatus for governing the state. The authors analyse how the non-glottographic statement is constructed and read not as linear flow of signs but as simulacrum; and on how the accounting statement poses both the practical issue of how to translate non-linear flow statements, and the conceptual problem of how to think this statement form’s general translatability, given its irreducibility to the linear narrative statement form.
Originality/value
The paper pioneers in approaching accounting as statement form in a way that analyses the differences that flow from its non-glottographic status.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference60 articles.
1. Baines, J. (2004), “The earliest Egyptian writing: development, context, purpose”, in Houston, S. (Ed.), The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 150-189.
2. Response by Bassnett to ‘Translation and the materialities of communication’;Translation Studies,2016
3. Bell, E., Warren, S. and Schoeder, J. (Eds) (2013), The Routledge Companion to Visual Organization, Routledge, Abingdon.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献