Author:
Khac Minh Nguyen,Lan Phung Mai,Khanh Pham Van
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to measure TFP growth and job reallocation in the Vietnamese manufacturing industry after the Doimoi period.
Design/methodology/approach
The study uses firm-level panel data from Vietnam’s annual enterprise survey data for 2000–2016 period in the Vietnamese manufacturing industry using Olley–Pakes static and dynamic productivity decomposition methods.
Findings
The aggregate productivity estimated from the WRDG method increased 2.323 percent, of which over 40 percent is due to the reallocation toward more productive firms. Olley–Pakes dynamic decomposition according to ownership, scale and industry shows that the contribution of private and state-owned firms and the contribution of small and medium firms and large firms to the TFP growth are 133, −33 percent, 58.56 and 41.44 percent, respectively. The within-firm productivity and net entry components are the main reasons for TFP growth rather than reallocation. The results show that the composition of the aggregate TFPs, estimated from WRDG, OP, LP and ACF, is correlated very high (over 80 percent) except for net entry components.
Research limitations/implications
The major limitation of this study is that the authors compute an aggregate productivity index using actual employment-based shares (still misallocation in labor), rather than optimal employment-based shares (no misallocation in labor).
Originality/value
Job reallocation between industries is attracting attention in developing countries, especially transition economies. However, knowledge about job reallocation among industries is limited. This paper assesses the level of job reallocation among private and state-owned firms, small and medium firms and large firms in Vietnam.
Reference18 articles.
1. Ackerberg, D.A., Caves, K. and Frazer, G. (2006), “Structural identification of production function”, MPRA paper, University Library of Munich, Munich.
2. Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing;Journal of Development Economics,2001
3. Cross-country differences in productivity: the role of allocation and selection;American Economic Review,2013
4. Job creation and job destruction and employment growth in newly established firms in transition countries: survey evidence from Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary;Journal of Comparative Economics,1998
5. Bojnec, S., Konings and Jozef (1998), “Job creation, job destruction and labour demand in Slovenia”, LLICOS Discussion Paper No. 74, Leuven.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献