Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the suitability of free carbon calculators aimed at the agricultural industry, for use in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission benchmarking, using the European dairy industry as an example.
Design/methodology/approach
Carbon calculators which were claimed to be applicable to European dairy farms were identified and tested using six production scenarios based on data from real European farms supplemented using published literature. The resulting GHG emission estimates, together with estimates apportioned using three functional units, were then compared to determine the robustness of the benchmarking results.
Findings
It was found that although there was a degree of agreement between the seven identified carbon calculators in terms of benchmarking total farm emissions, once a suitable functional unit was applied little agreement remained. Tools often ranked farms in different orders, thereby calling into question the robustness of benchmarking in the studied sector.
Research limitations/implications
The scenario-based approach taken has identified issues liable to result in a lack of benchmarking robustness within this sector; however, there remains considerable scope to evaluate these findings in the field, both within this sector and others in the agricultural industry.
Practical implications
The results suggest that there are significant hurdles to overcome if GHG emission benchmarking is to aid in driving forward the environmental performance of the dairy industry. In addition, eco-labelling foods based on GHG benchmarking may be of questionable value.
Originality/value
At a time when environmental benchmarking is of increasing importance, this paper seeks to evaluate its applicability to sectors in which there is considerable scope for variation in the results obtained.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference72 articles.
1. Alexandratos, N. and Bruinsma, J. (2012), “World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision”, Working Paper No. 12-03, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, June.
2. Should we be benchmarking? Sheep and beef notes,2002
3. Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach;Benchmarking: An International Journal,1999
4. Carbon labelling: too complex or will it transform our buying?;Significance,2008
5. Unilateral climate policy design: efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage;Energy Economics,2012
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献