Abstract
Purpose
Bridging noted gaps in the sharing economy and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how an organization-sponsored sharing platform – a new class of information technology (IT) and the sharing economy ideal – is given meaning as a CSR program for internal stakeholders.
Design/methodology/approach
The research involves phone interviews conducted with site coordinators of the Zimride by Enterprise® ridesharing platform in 25 organizations.
Findings
This case study reveals that two component processes of organizational sensemaking – sensegiving and sensebreaking – are underlying micromechanisms used by organizations to enact a sponsored sharing platform as a CSR program. Qualitative analyses demonstrate that every meaning given to Zimride remained open to sensebreaking during its implementation. As such, site coordinators were continuously drawn into sensemaking about Zimride’s cognitive, linguistic and conative dimensions as a CSR program and had to exert ongoing effort to stabilize its socially (re)constructed meaning within their organization. Furthermore, site coordinators’ sensegiving narrative about Zimride was often undermined by their sensebreaking communications and organizational actions, albeit unintentionally.
Research limitations/implications
Sponsoring a sharing platform to facilitate collaborative consumption can deliver triple bottom line benefits for both organizations and their members, but it may not. The key to accruing this potential shared value lies is how site coordinators navigate organizational sensemaking about these IT-enabled CSR programs.
Originality/value
This paper provides valuable insights into these sensemaking processes and develops a prescriptive framework for enacting an organization-sponsored sharing platform as a CSR program.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference37 articles.
1. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: an organizing framework;Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2017
2. Aguinis, H. (2011), “Organizational responsibility: doing good and doing well”, in Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 855-879.
3. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda;Journal of Management,2012
4. Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: psychological foundations;Industrial and Organizational Psychology,2013
5. Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing;Journal of Consumer Research,2012
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献