Author:
Dua Pami,Garg Niti Khandelwal
Abstract
Purpose
The study aims to empirically investigate the trends and determinants of labour productivity of the two broad sectors –industry and services – and their components, namely, manufacturing and market services sectors, in the case of major developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific over the period 1980-2014 and make a comparison thereof.
Design/methodology/approach
The study uses econometric methodology of panel unit root tests, panel cointegration and group-mean full modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS).
Findings
The study finds that while capital deepening, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector and financial openness affect productivity of all the sectors significantly, the impact of human capital and trade openness varies across sectors in the case of developing economies. Furthermore, the impact of technological progress becomes significant in the post-liberalization reforms period in the developing economies. The study further finds that capital deepening, human capital, government size, institutional quality, productivity of the other sector, government size and trade openness are significant determinants of productivity of all sectors of developed economies under consideration. However, the impact of technological progress is stronger for manufacturing sector than services and its components. Furthermore, while both equity and debt liabilities (as measures of financial openness) influence sectoral productivity of industry and manufacturing sectors positively and significantly in case of developed economies, only equity liabilities have a significant influence on the productivity of developing economies. This may indicate existence of more developed financial markets in the case of developed economies.
Originality/value
The study identifies important structural differences in determinants of productivity both across sectors and across developing and developed economies of Asia-Pacific.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development,Business and International Management
Reference51 articles.
1. Trade openness, structural change and total factor productivity;International Economic Journal,2009
2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, S. (2004), “Institutions as the fundamental cause of growth”, NBER Working Paper No.10481, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
3. Institutions, political economy and growth,2009
4. International R&D spillovers and productivity trends in the Asian miracle countries;Economic Inquiry,2013
5. Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic;Journal of International Economics,2011
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献