Author:
Cotter Pádraig,Hollwey Sara,Carr Alan
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to appraise “transference” and “countertransference” when working with people with intellectual disabilities (PWID).
Design/methodology/approach
A review of the literature was conducted, followed by a discussion.
Findings
No research articles were found. Potential reasons for this are discussed. Historical influence, complexity of the topic and resistance among professionals may be contributing factors. Despite this, these phenomena are important for several reasons. These include the high levels of trauma these clients experience; the manner in which they have been marginalised by mainstream society; the strong likelihood of PWID evoking difficult countertransference from therapists; and the myriad of coping mechanisms and defences that these clients may employ.
Research limitations/implications
Research is needed to further current understanding of these issues.
Practical implications
An awareness of these issues amongst practitioners and other key members of a PWID’s system is important.
Originality/value
This is the first review and commentary on these issues.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology,Pshychiatric Mental Health
Reference39 articles.
1. Disability and psychotherapy practice: cultural competence and practical tips;Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,2010
2. The Negro in American culture;CrossCurrents,1961
3. Sexual abuse in children and adolescents with intellectual disability;Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,2001
4. Beail, N. and Jackson, T. (2009), “Psychodynamic formulation”, in Sturmey, P. (Ed.), Varieties in Case Formulation, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 251-67.
5. Attitudes towards people with intellectual disability in the UK and Libya: a cross-cultural comparison;Research in Developmental Disabilities,2016
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献