Author:
Blessy Sekome Nkoko,Taddesse Lemma Tesfaye
Abstract
Purpose
– The aim of this paper is to examine the nexus between firm-specific attributes and a company’s decision to setup a separate risk management committee (RMC) as a sub-committee of the board within the context of an emerging economy, South Africa.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors analyse data extracted from audited annual financial reports of 181 non-financial firms listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) by using logistic regression technique.
Findings
– The results show a strong positive relationship between the existence of a separate RMC and board independence, board size, firm size and industry type. However, the authors fail to find support for the hypotheses that independent board chairman, auditor reputation, reporting risk and financial leverage have an influence on a firm’s decision to establish RMC as a separately standing committee in the board structure. The findings signify the role of costs associated with information asymmetry, agency, upkeep of a standalone RMC, damage to the reputation of directors and industry-specific idiosyncrasies on a firm’s decision to form a separate RMC.
Research limitations/implications
– As in most empirical studies, this study focuses on listed firms. Nonetheless, future studies that focus on non-listed firms could add additional insights to the literature. Investigating the role of firm-specific governance attributes other than those considered in the present study (e.g. gender of directors, ownership structure, etc.) could further enhance the understanding of antecedents of risk-management practices.
Practical implications
– The findings have practical implications for the investment community in assessing the quality of risk management practices of companies listed on the JSE. Furthermore, the results provide insights that are potentially useful to the King Committee and other corporate governance regulators in South Africa in their effort to improve corporate governance practices.
Originality/value
– The present study focuses on firms drawn from an emerging economy which has profound economic, institutional, political and cultural differences compared to advanced economies, which have received a disproportionately higher share of attention in prior studies. Thus, the study contributes additional insights to the literature on corporate risk management from the perspective of an emerging economy.
Subject
Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference85 articles.
1. Anand, A.
,
Milne, F.
and
Purda, L.
(2006), “Voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms”, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=921450 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.921450
2. Bagley, S.C.
,
White, H.
and
Golomb, B.A.
(2001), “Logistic regression in the medical literature: standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain”, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 979-985.
3. Bates, E.W.I.
and
Leclerc, R.J.
(2009), “Boards of directors and risk committees”, The Corporate Governance Adviser, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 15-17.
4. Beasley, M.S.
,
Carcello, J.V.
and
Hermanson, D.R.
(1999), Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987-1997, An Analysis of US Public Companies, COSO, New York, NY.
5. Beasley, M.S.
,
Clune, R.
and
Hermanson, D.R.
(2005), “Enterprise risk management: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 521-531.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献