You can't shop with us: how US-based, value- and mid-market online clothing retailers position their plus-size female clothing sections

Author:

Shelton Summer SuzanneORCID,Bradshaw Amanda S.ORCID,Cretul Matthew,Treise Debbie

Abstract

PurposePlus-size women represent a large consumer segment that has grown in popularity with the fashion industry, retailers and advertisers. Despite advancements in clothing availability for plus-sized women, the shopping experience for these women (compared with that of straight-size women) often still falls short. The current experience leaves plus-sized women feel like a second-class, minority group despite the fact that the majority of women in USA are considered plus-size. The purpose of this study was to assess how US-based, value- and mid-market online clothing retailers position their plus-size female clothing sections in their site navigation.Design/methodology/approachThis study assessed the websites of N = 68 popular plus- and straight-sized US-based, value- and mid-market retailers to evaluate the placement of, and options available in, their plus-sized clothing sections.FindingsFindings revealed that the majority of retailers completely separated out the plus-sized section from the straight-sized section and that the language used to describe plus-size clothing was body-focused (versus clothing-focused for straight-size clothing sections). Theoretical and practical implications for marketers, advertisers and retailers are discussed.Originality/valueThis is the first study to assess the separation of plus- and straight-sized clothing sections in online retail spaces. As brands begin to consider combining plus- and straight-sized clothing sections (see Old Navy), it is important to assess how wide-spread the separation of sections currently is in online retail environments.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing,Business and International Management

Reference62 articles.

1. Communicating stigma about body size;Health Communication,2013

2. Felt stigma and obesity: introducing the generalized other;Social Science & Medicine,2015

3. Bhattarai, A. (2017), “Online retailers seize on long-ignored market: women size 16 and up”, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/online-retailers-seize-on-long-ignored-market-women-size-16-and-up/2017/09/15/414d5c84-657e-11e7-a1d7-9a32c91c6f40_storyhtml (accessed 19 September 2021).

4. Are U.S. plus-size women satisfied with retail clothing store environments?;Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior,2015

5. Binkley, C. (2019), “Should brands charge more for larger sizes?” VogueBusiness, available at: www.voguebusiness.com/fashion/extended-sizing-price-dolce-gabbana-11-honore (accessed 19 September 2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3