Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say

Author:

Eskerod Pernille,Huemann Martina

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze how various approaches to stakeholder management, as well as sustainable development principles, are included in internationally‐used project management standards; and to consider the demands these approaches and principles place on project stakeholder management.Design/methodology/approachAn analytical framework was developed based on stakeholder theory within general management, as well as on sustainability research. Desk research was carried out by applying the analytical framework to three project management standards: ICB, PMBOK and PRINCE2.FindingsThe research findings suggest that stakeholder issues are treated superficially in the project management standards, while putting stakeholder management in the context of sustainable development would ask for a paradigm shift in the underpinning values. The current project stakeholder practices represent mainly a management‐of‐stakeholders approach, i.e. making stakeholders comply to project needs, whereas a management‐for‐stakeholders approach may be beneficial.Research limitations/implicationsAs the analysis is based on document studies of bodies of knowledge, the authors cannot be sure to what extent the standards represent real‐life practices. However, the standards are developed by practitioners agreeing on common practices. Further, they are used to certify project managers worldwide. Therefore, the authors find it safe to claim that the findings are relevant when discussing project management practices.Originality/valueThe value of this paper lies in the enrichment of the understanding of project stakeholder management by applying concepts from general stakeholder theory and sustainable development research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference62 articles.

1. Aaltonen, K. (2010), “Stakeholder management in international projects”, Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 2010/13, Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Helsinki.

2. Abrams, F. (1954), “Management responsibilities in a complex world”, in Carroll, T. (Ed.), Business Education for Competence and Responsibility, University of North California Press, Chapel Hill, NC.

3. Ackoff, R. (1974), Redesigning the Future, Wiley, New York, NY.

4. Ahlemann, F., Teuteberg, F. and Vogelsang, K. (2009), “Project management standards – diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, pp. 292‐303.

5. Andersen, E.S. (2008), Rethinking Project Management: An Organisational Perspective, Prentice‐Hall/Financial Times, Harlow.

Cited by 202 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3