Author:
Keller Sarah,Otjen A.J.,McNally Mary,Wilkinson Timothy J.,Dockery Brenda,Leonard Jennifer,Southworth Hayley
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this research project was to improve public awareness to improve public awareness of the importance of energy conservation and to improve the use of simple conservation strategies. A thorough evaluation of the net gain from the numerous energy campaigns rolled out to the public every year is lacking. This study conducted pre- and post-campaign surveys and focus groups to evaluate one campaign’s impact on self-reported energy behaviors.
Design/methodology/approach
The campaign used television public service announcements and a website to improve awareness of the city’s efforts to conserve energy and to increase individual energy conservation practices. Focus groups (n = 40) were used to identify common barriers to conservation, and pre- and post-surveys (n = 533, 479) were conducted to evaluate the campaign’s effectiveness.
Findings
Results indicated that the campaign increased positive changes in changing light bulbs and confidence in taking action to turn down thermostats, unplug devices and turn off lights. While follow-up research is needed on the precise mechanism of the psychological process at work, the findings are consistent with the concepts of self and response efficacy as needed components of any behavior change. The authors advocate the adoption of research-informed message design to maximize communication campaign effects.
Originality/value
This paper demonstrates how the combination of three prominent persuasion theories can be used to develop behavior change campaigns. Also, it is one of the few studies to evaluate the effectiveness of the Energy Star campaign.
Reference43 articles.
1. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation;Journal of Environmental Psychology,2005
2. Alliance to Save Energy (2010), “Energy hog public awareness campaign”, available at: http://ase.org/uploaded_files/consumers/EnergyHogCampaignOverview.pdf (accessed 14 April 2010).
3. Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace;Journal of Public Policy and Marketing,2002
4. Discursive psychology: an alternative conceptual foundation to means–end chain theory;Psychology and Marketing,2000
5. Cultivating the green consumer;Stanford Social Innovation Review,2008
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献