How insights from the field of information behavior can enrich understanding of knowledge mobilization

Author:

Nicolini DavideORCID,Korica Maja,Bharatan Ila

Abstract

PurposeThe authors review the literature on information behavior, an autonomous body of work developed mainly in library studies and compare it with work on knowledge mobilization. The aim is to explore how information behavior can contribute to understanding knowledge mobilization in healthcare management.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a narrative review using an exploratory, nonkeyword “double-sided systematic snowball” method. This is especially useful in the situation when the two traditions targeted are broad and relies on distinct vocabulary.FindingsThe authors find that the two bodies of work have followed similar trajectories and arrived at similar conclusions, with a linear view supplemented first by a social approach and then by a sensitivity to practice. Lessons from the field of information behavior can be used to avoid duplication of effort, repeating the same errors and reinventing the wheel among knowledge translation scholars. This includes, for example, focusing on sources of information or ignoring the mundane activities in which managers and policymakers are involved.Originality/valueThe study is the first known attempt to build bridges between the field of information behavior and the study of knowledge mobilization. The study, moreover, foregrounds the need to address knowledge mobilization in context-sensitive and social rather than technical terms, focusing on the mundane work performed by a variety of human and nonhuman agents.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference112 articles.

1. Reconceptualizing knowledge accumulation in sociology;The American Sociologist,2006

2. Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: a study of managers' information gathering behaviors;Journal of Organizational Behavior,2008

3. Knowledge utilization: the 3rd wave;Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization,1991

4. Bates, M.J. (2010), “Information”, in Bates, M.J. and Maack, M.N. (Eds), Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd ed., Vol. 3, CRC Press, New York, pp. 2381-2391.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3