Which moral hazard? Health care reform under the Affordable Care Act of 2010
Author:
Mendoza Roger Lee
Abstract
Purpose
– Moral hazard is a concept that is central to risk and insurance management. It refers to change in economic behavior when individuals are protected or insured against certain risks and losses whose costs are borne by another party. It asserts that the presence of an insurance contract increases the probability of a claim and the size of a claim. Through the US Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, this study seeks to examine the validity and relevance of moral hazard in health care reform and determine how welfare losses or inefficiencies could be mitigated.
Design/methodology/approach
– This study is divided into three sections. The first contrasts conventional moral hazard from an emerging or alternative theory. The second analyzes moral hazard in terms of the evolution, organization, management, and marketing of health insurance in the USA. The third explains why and how salient reform measures under the ACA might induce health care consumption and production in ways that could either promote or restrict personal health and safety as well as social welfare maximization.
Findings
– Insurance generally induces health care (over) consumption. However, not every additional consumption, with or without adverse selection, can be considered wasteful or risky, even if it might cost insurers more in the short run. Moral hazard can generate welfare and equity gains. These gains might vary depending on which ACA provisions, insured population, covered illnesses, treatments, and services, as well as health outcomes are taken into account, and because of the relative ambiguities surrounding definitions of “health.” Actuarial risk models can nonetheless benefit from incorporating welfare and equity gains into their basic assumptions and estimations.
Originality/value
– This is the first study which examines the ACA in the context of the new or alternative theory of moral hazard. It suggests that containing inefficient moral hazard, and encouraging its desirable counterpart, are prime challenges in any health care reform initiative, especially as it adapts to the changing demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the insured population and regulatory landscape of health insurance in the USA.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference59 articles.
1. Aron-Dine, A.
,
Einav, L.
and
Finkelstein, A.
(2012), “Moral hazard in health insurance: how important is forward looking behavior?”, NBER Working Paper No. 17802, Cambridge, MA. 2. Aron-Dine, A.
,
Einav, L.
and
Finkelstein, A.
(2013), “The RAND health insurance experiment, three decades later”,
Journal of Economic Perspectives
, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 197-222. 3. Arrow, K.
(1963), “Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care”,
The American Economic Review
, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 941-973. 4. Ayres, S.M.
(1996),
Health Care in America: The Facts & the Choices (Last Quarter Century)
, American Library Association, Chicago, IL. 5. Baicker, K.
,
Taubman, S.L.
,
Allen, H.L.
,
Bernstein, M.
,
Gruber, J.H.
,
Newhouse, J.P.
,
Schneider, E.C.
,
Wright, B.J.
,
Zaslavsky, A.M.
and
Finkelstein, A.N.
(2013), “The Oregon experiment – effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes”,
New England Journal of Medicine
, Vol. 368 No. 18, pp. 1713-1722.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|