Author:
Hadro Dominika,Fijałkowska Justyna,Daszyńska-Żygadło Karolina,Zumente Ilze,Mjakuškina Svetlana
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to verify whether non-financial disclosure in the construction industry (CI) responds to stakeholders’ information needs and explores the most frequent topics disclosed in terms of the environmental, social and governance (ESG) pillars.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses a bag-of-words method and latent Dirichlet allocation to match stakeholders’ expectations with information disclosed by companies. This paper assesses the publicly available non-financial disclosure of the 46 European CI companies covered by the Refinitiv database with ESG scores.
Findings
This study provides two main findings. First, it shows the mismatch between stakeholders’ information needs and what they get in non-financial reporting. Despite non-financial information in CI disclosure, the information disclosed by many CI companies does not meet their users’ information needs. CI companies commonly focus on their sustainable products and health policy while omitting other topics of interest – the circular economy, unethical business behaviour, migrant policy and human trafficking. Second, this study indicates the defects of simple disclosure analysis based on keywords and highlights the importance of context in information analysis.
Practical implications
The proposed novel approach to text analysis offers several practical applications. It is a more effective tool for evaluating companies’ sustainability performance. It may be especially important to ESG rating providers. Additionally, the results may be of interest to companies wishing to improve their communication, and, in particular, to regulators and standard setters in two matters. The first is the need for more pressure to increase awareness among issuers to shift from disclosing large amounts of non-financial information to disclosing good quality non-financial information, which would be appropriate for meeting stakeholders’ expectations. The second is the necessity for deepening issuers’ understanding of the diverse stakeholders’ information needs, considering the substantial differences among industries and improving communication to meet them.
Originality/value
This study introduces text analysis that, apart from keywords, considers the context of these keywords’ appearances in a report’s narration. It allows a significantly improved understanding of the information disclosed and a more stable grounding for reasoning, leading to better and informed decisions. Moreover, this study verifies how the information disclosed matches stakeholders’ needs. Finally, it enriches the literature on sectoral analysis concerning non-financial disclosure.
Reference104 articles.
1. Integrated reporting: perspectives of corporate report preparers and other stakeholders;Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal,2019
2. How corporate social responsibility helps MNEs to improve their reputation;Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2018
3. Amel-Zadeh, A. and Serafeim, G. (2017), “Why and how investors use ESG information: evidence from a global survey”, Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 17-079, February, available at: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30838135
4. Sustainable construction management: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis;Journal of Cleaner Production,2020
5. Beyond numbers: how investment managers accommodate societal issues in financial decisions;Organization Studies,2018
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献