Author:
Bruno Cyrino Alvaro,Penido Barcellos Erika,Tanure Betania
Abstract
PurposeIt has been argued in the international business literature that companies begin their internationalization trajectories by entering countries that are geographically and psychically closest to the country in which their home market is located before entering more distant ones. This paper aims to verify whether this assertion is correct for Brazilian companies. If it is correct, the companies would be expected to begin their international expansion in countries within the Latin America region. Not only is this region closest in geographical distance, but also it is most similar to Brazil in many other important dimensions.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is an exploratory and quantitative research undertaken with a sample of 109 national capital companies selected from the 1,000 largest Brazilian companies in 2001 net revenues.FindingsEmpirical findings indicate that countries in Latin America have been most frequently chosen by Brazilian companies for their first expansions into international markets. Nevertheless, some companies choose divergent trajectories, initially entering markets that are geographically and psychically more distant. Those companies enjoyed structural features of certain sectors (commodities or global sectors), in which the importance of psychic distance is smaller in the face of economic transactions.Research limitations/implicationsAn important limitation of this paper is the impossibility to test the hypotheses in specific countries or markets. The authors are forced to analyze the psychic distance effect among regions, with the risk of not accounting for important intra‐regional differences.Originality/valueThe data presented in this paper have clarified some patterns and trajectories of Brazilian companies in international markets.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference37 articles.
1. Agarwal, S. (1994), “Socio‐cultural distance and the choice of joint ventures: a contingency perspective”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 63‐80.
2. Cyrino, A. and Oliveira Júnior, M. (2003), “Emerging global players: evidences from the internationalization processes of Brazilian firms”, Encontro Anual da ANPAD, Proceedings of the XXVII ENANPAD, Atibaia, ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 1‐16.
3. Dow, D. and Karunaratna, A. (2006), “Developing a multidimensional scale to measure psychic distance stimuli”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 578‐602.
4. Doz, Y., Santos, J. and Willianson, P. (2001), From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
5. Evans, J. and Mavondo, F.T. (2002), “Psychic distance and organizational performance: an empirical examination of international retailing operations”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 515‐32.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献