Cybersecurity economics – balancing operational security spending

Author:

Ekelund Stale,Iskoujina Zilia

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to find the optimal investment level in protecting an organisation’s assets. Design/methodology/approach This study integrates a case study of an international financial organisation with various methods and theories in security economics and mathematics, such as value-at-risk (VaR), Monte Carlo simulation, exponential and Poisson probability distributions. Thereby it combines theory and empirical findings to establish a new approach to determining optimal security investment levels. Findings The results indicate that optimal security investment levels can be found through computer simulation with historical incident data to find VaR. By combining various scenarios, the convex graph of the risk cost function has been plotted, where the minimum of the graph represents the optimal invest level for an asset. Research limitations/implications The limitations of the research include a modest number of loss observations from one case study, and the use of normal probability distribution. The approach has limitations where there are no historical data available or the data has zero losses. These areas should undergo further research including larger data set of losses and exploring other probability distributions. Practical implications The results can be used by leading business practitioners to assist them with decision making on investment to the increased protection of an asset. Originality/value The originality of this research is in its new way of combining theories with historical data to create methods to measure theoretical and empirical strength of a control (or set of controls) and translating it to loss probabilities and loss sizes.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference53 articles.

1. Anderson, R. and Schneier, B. (2004), “Economics of information security”, available at: www.schneier.com/academic/paperfiles/paper-economics.pdf/ (accessed 19 September 2018).

2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005), “An explanatory note on the Basel II IRB risk weight functions”, available at: www.bis.org/bcbs/irbriskweight.pdf/ (accessed 16 February 2017).

3. Brecht, M. and Nowey, T. (2012), “A closer look at information security costs”, available at: www.econinfosec.org/archive/weis2012/papers/Brecht_WEIS2012.pdf (accessed 19 September 2018).

4. Buith, J. (2015), “The benefits, limits of cyber value-at-risk”, The Wall Street Journal, 4 May, available at: http://deloitte.wsj.com/cio/2015/05/04/the-benefits-limits-of-cyber-value-at-risk/ (accessed 19 September 2018).

5. Anybody can do value at risk: a teaching study using parametric computation and Monte Carlo simulation;Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3