Author:
Dixit Jyoti,Singh Poonam,Haldar Arunima
Abstract
Purpose
Takeovers play a critical role as an external corporate governance mechanism to ensure investor protection. There is a long-standing debate on whether the convergence of corporate governance to global standards can enable emerging economies to ensure investor protection. This paper aims to analyse the evolution of the takeover code, namely, Securities Exchange Board of India’s Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (2011) in India from the lens of investor protection. It then compares the takeover provisions in India, the USA, the UK, Singapore and Australia to examine the extent of convergence and its implications for investor protection.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a cross-national comparative analysis of takeover mechanisms in common law countries, the study analyses the extent and relevance of convergence in form. The focus of the comparison is on regulations governing offer size, offer price, creeping acquisition and initial trigger limit for the mandatory open offer.
Findings
The findings suggest that certain provisions such as the initial trigger threshold for the mandatory offer and the offer prices of the Indian takeover code are converging with the standards in common law countries. However, the offer price determination based on market prices may not reflect true market value in an inefficient market like India. Other provisions such as creeping acquisition and offer size are not only diverging from the international standards but are also inconsistent with the key objective of investor protections of the Indian regulator.
Research limitations/implications
Indian takeover regulation needs to converge to higher global standards to ensure adherence to improved investor protection. This needs to be done for the initial trigger limit for mandatory bid and offer prices, after accounting for the differences in institutional structure. The Indian regulators need to revisit provisions on the initial trigger, creeping acquisition to converge to the broader principle of investor protection.
Originality/value
This technical paper provides a comprehensive depiction of takeover mechanisms in an emerging economy context as a means of investor protection. Further using a comparative lens, it analyses the relevance of convergence of takeover laws. Thus, advances the theoretical knowledge of limited extant work on external corporate governance mechanism in an emerging economy context.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference66 articles.
1. Agarwal, K. (2018), “Takeover laws and implications: a comparison between the United States and Singapore”, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3215481
2. Corporate governance and competition,2000
3. Who writes the rules for hostile takeovers, and why-the peculiar divergence of US and UK takeover regulation;Georgetown Law Journal,2006
4. The divergence of US and UK takeover regulation;Regulation,2007
5. Banaji, J. (2005), “Thwarting the market for corporate control: takeover regulation in India”, available at: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/10920/1/QEH_banaji.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献