Author:
Han Eunyoung,Kim Kyung Kyu,Lee Ae Ri
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate which exchange structure, direct or generalized exchange, better promotes community solidarity in online communities (OCs). Furthermore, it examines the moderating effects of activity intensity on the relationship between exchange structure and community solidarity in order to resolve the conflicts in extant literature.
Design/methodology/approach
The research model is developed based on the social exchange theory (SET). It also accommodates social structures as determinants of exchange structure, such as organizational identity orientation (OIO) and distributive justice norms. Data in this study were collected from 376 OCs through an e-mail survey.
Findings
Generalized exchange has stronger effects on community solidarity than direct exchange. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the impact on community solidarity between generalized exchange and direct exchange at high-activity intensity levels, whereas no significant differences were found at low-activity intensity conditions. OIO significantly influences exchange structure. Additionally, equality norm significantly influences generalized exchange, whereas need norm significantly influences direct exchange.
Originality/value
In information systems research, there have not been any attempts to identify the determinants of exchange structure in OCs. Furthermore, only a couple of studies have empirically investigated the relationship between exchange structure and OC solidarity, and yet they found conflicting results. This research makes contributions to an enhancement of theoretical precision of the SET in two ways: by empirically examining the determinants of exchange structure, and by introducing a third variable, activity intensity, as a moderator of the relationship between exchange structure and OC solidarity.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference96 articles.
1. Organizational identity;Research in Organizational Behavior,1985
2. Generalized exchange;American Journal of Sociology,1997
3. Bies, R.J. and Tripp, T.M. (2005), “The study of revenge in the workplace: conceptual, ideological, and empirical issues”, in Fox, S. and Spector, P.E. (Eds), Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Investigations of Actions and Tactics, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 65-82.
4. How to manage outside innovation;MIT Sloan Management Review,2009
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献