Abstract
PurposeThe study's purpose was to gather scientist end‐user perceptions of their impending phased move to a new facility within a US national laboratory site.Design/methodology/approachThe researchers, a college faculty member and three undergraduate student interns, visited 59 laboratories and asked an open‐ended question. Based on assessments of subjects' responses, the raters independently assigned ratings to subjects.FindingsA total of 57 ratings were given by three undergraduate intern raters for 19 scientist subjects. Raters selected the relatively positive, Pragmatic rating for the majority of subjects. Some inter‐rater reliability was found.Research limitations/implicationsThe relatively small subject sample and case study nature of this work limits the ability to generalize. However, this case study fills a gap in the body of knowledge regarding scientists' perceptions of laboratory moves and contributes to facility management education by documenting the successful involvement of undergraduates in field studies.Practical implicationsThis research provides end‐user evidence necessary for developing or communicating move protocols at this site as well as others. The methodology developed in this study may be adopted at other laboratories and facilities with a large number of knowledge workers.Social implicationsThis facility management research strives to support scientists in their work and therefore contributes to the fulfilment of a national laboratory's mission.Originality/valueThis unique study involves undergraduate interns in a research project at a national laboratory and contributes to the understanding of facility management issues related to laboratory environments and scientist end‐users. Prior to this study, little scientific research regarding laboratory end‐users was found.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference29 articles.
1. Burke, L. and Cummins, M. (2002), “Using undergraduate student‐faculty collaborative research projects to personalize teaching”, College Teaching, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 129‐33.
2. Caccavo, F. (2009), “Teaching undergraduates to think like scientists”, College Teaching, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 9‐14.
3. California Institute of Technology Environment Health and Safety Office (2004), Laboratory Relocation Guidelines, available at: http://safety.caltech.edu/documents/62‐lab_relocation_guide.pdf.
4. Capasso, M. (2003), “The art of the successful organisational move”, Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 35‐53.
5. Cardona, V. (2009a), “Laboratory design: boundary‐busting labs: designing the future of breakthrough research”, R&D Magazine, pp. 1‐6, available at: www.rdmag.com/Lab‐Design‐New/Articles/2008/11/Boundary‐busting‐labs–Designing‐the‐future‐of‐breakthrough‐research/.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献