A strategic standpoint on maintenance taxonomy

Author:

Khazraei Khashayar,Deuse Jochen

Abstract

PurposeMaintenance, an essential element of facilities management and a fundamental requisite for increasing availability and sustaining stable processes, has been the focus of technical research for decades. However, there has not been a concrete and well‐structured classification of different maintenance types that is accepted globally. The need for such a widely acceptable classification is the main incentive to delve into and create a new maintenance taxonomy. This paper aims to address this issue.Design/methodology/approachThe paper gathers and reviews several examples of maintenance classifications and viewpoints from different geographical regions in the world. Afterwards, it integrates various maintenance‐related terms and terminologies with the authors' systematic‐thinking approach, systems thinking, based on which strategic thinking is formed. Consequently, this combination results in a globally acceptable systematic classification of maintenance.FindingsThe outcome of this scientific endeavour is a newly developed maintenance taxonomy, which is established according to the correct and clear‐cut use of the terminologies of strategy, policy and tactic, which correspondingly connote the art and science of what, the plan and guideline of how, and the style and methodology of how.Practical implicationsThis paper provides maintenance and facility stakeholders with a new maintenance taxonomy based on the available terminologies and practices taking into account the conception of strategy science. Such a classification cannot only ease the technical communication in this sector but also be accepted as a global standard due its lucid and logical structure.Originality/valueAside from the literature review and comparison of different maintenance terminologies and classifications, the paper offers a new methodical classification of maintenance, which has a strong scientific foundation and can be commonly accepted as a standard in the field of maintenance and facilities management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference69 articles.

1. Aaltonen, P. and Ikävalko, H. (2002), “Implementing strategies successfully”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 415‐18.

2. Bareiß, J., Buck, P., Matschecko, B., Jovanovic, A., Baloc, D. and Perunicic, M. (2004), “RIMAP demonstration project: risk‐based life management of piping system in power plant Heilbronn”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 81, pp. 807‐13.

3. Becker, K.C., Byington, C.S., Forbes, N.A. and Nickerson, G.W. (1998), “Prediction and preventing machine failures”, The Industrial Physicist, December, pp. 20‐3.

4. Bengtsson, M., Olsson, E., Funk, P. and Jackson, M. (2004), “Technical design of condition based maintenance system – a case study using sound analysis and cased‐based reasoning”, paper presented at the 8th Maintenance Reliability Conference Proceedings, Knoxville, TN.

5. Castanier, B., Grall, A. and Bèrenguer, C. (2005), “A condition‐based policy with non‐periodic inspections for a two‐unit series system”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 87 No. 1, pp. 109‐20.

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3