Author:
Lee‐Lee Chong,Hui‐Boon Tan
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the factors of exchange rate volatility from the macroeconomic perspective for four neighbouring ASEAN economies.Design/methodology/approachThis study has scrutinised the link between macroeconomic factors and exchange rate volatility in both the short and the long run by applying econometrics techniques.FindingsThis study further suggests the link between macroeconomic factors and exchange rate volatility in both the short and the long run for the selected economies. The empirical results, however, indicate that a set of common factors seems to influence the exchange rate volatility, whereby the stock market is a great influence commonly found across countries. The Indonesian rupiah seems to be the most sensitive to the innovations in macroeconomic factors, while the Singapore dollar is the least.Research limitations/implicationsThe macroeconomic factors are believed to be the forces behind exchange rate volatility through the presumable rigidities of their exchange rates, resulting from the managed float exchange rate system adopted by those countries. Their capital markets are vital in maintaining exchange rate stability, hence suggesting the imperative role of respective authorities and market players in managing a viable capital market.Originality/valueLittle attention has been given to developing countries' experiment with their exchange rate systems due to their presumed rigid volatility. This study adopts a more sophisticated approach in measuring the volatility of the exchange rate and examines the underlying factors of exchange rate volatility instead of the level of exchange rate.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference33 articles.
1. Alba, J.D. and Papell, D.H. (1998), “Exchange rate determination and inflation in Southeast Asian countries”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 421‐37.
2. Bahmani‐Oskooee, M. and Kara, O. (2000), “Exchange rate overshooting in Turkey”, Economics Letters, Vol. 68, pp. 89‐93.
3. Bahmani‐Oskooee, M. and Ng, R.C.W. (2002), “Long‐run demand for money in Hong Kong: an application of the ARDL model”, International Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 147‐55.
4. Bond, C.A. and Najand, M. (2002), “Volatility changes in European currency exchange rates due to EMS announcements”, Global Finance Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 93‐108.
5. Chou, W.L. and Lee, D.S.K. (2003), “Cointegration analysis of audit pricing model: a panel unit root test approach”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 30 Nos 7/8, pp. 1141‐64.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献