Optimised management for the development of extraordinary public properties
Author:
Manganelli Benedetto,Tajani Francesco
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to propose a management model of public assets within public-private partnerships which can be applied to properties subject to a possible requalification through the redevelopment and/or modification of the intended use.
Design/methodology/approach
– The logic developed is described by an algorithm which borrows the mathematical tools of Operations Research to identify the solution that maximises the utility functions of the parties related to the requalification and management of a public property. The unknowns of the model are the price and concession period, while the constraints reflect the specific and reciprocal conveniences of the actors involved.
Findings
– The benefits for the private investor are a reduction of the business risk, related to the lower financial outlay required by the investment, and therefore easier access to credit from banks. For the public administration, an increase in the demand of the property offered, savings in the property management costs, along with the preservation of public property. This aspect of no small importance where there is the fear of breaking up public property which local communities attach a high cultural and historic value.
Practical implications
– This leads to a logical support to public administrations involved in the requalification of property assets.
Originality/value
– This paper presents a strategic approach with long-term prospects, which interprets in a different way a pure concession model, which has a greater flexibility and articulation and also enriches the framework of the projects (public-private) considered necessary for the requalification of public property as well as possible urban transformation projects.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference41 articles.
1. Andrew, A.
and
Pitt, M.
(2006), “Property depreciation in government”, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 259-263. 2. Bennett, J.
and
Iossa, E.
(2002), “Building and managing facilities for public services”, Discussion Paper 02-08, Department of Economics and Finance, Brunel University, London. 3. Bing, L.
,
Akintoye, A.
,
Edwards, P.J.
and
Hardcastle, C.
(2005), “The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK”, International Journal of Project Management, No. 23, pp. 25-35. 4. Bourguignon, C.
(2013), “Leases, concessions, and authorizations: searching for an alternative to the privatization of federal domain in Brazil”, Land Use Policy, No. 33, pp. 100-110. 5. Boyce, B.N.
(1975), Real Estate Appraisal Terminology, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and the Society of Real Estate Appraisers, Chicago, IL, p. -.
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|